Branding, Identity and Logo Design – eBay Just Got More Pinteresting

eBay Launches Site and Logo Redesign, Joins Twitter, Arby’s, Windows and Brooklyn Nets

Today, eBay launched a Pinteresting new site redesign in addition to its new logo in a smart move that signals new direction, renewed sense of purpose and eBay’s desire to keep up with times. I’m not saying it’s a great logo design – because someone said it better. I do think eBay is being honest. Yes, it’s more corporate and less quirky. But the new logo and site redesign puts eBay back in the game, and the game is definitely less quirky and more corporate.

So far, 2012 has been a big year for logo redesign: eBay, Twitter, Arby’s, Wendy’s, Microsoft, and Brooklyn Nets all updated their branding. What other brands need a makeover? I’ll get to that. Meanwhile, take a look at this fine writeup on why new Wendy’s logo is so great, or marvel at this excellent Brooklyn Nets logo style guide in New York Times, explaining all the new logo elements to the point where I’m completely in love. Can your logo do that? Yes, quirky flare still win in my world. Blanding, a new term for an emerging trend of logos loosing their swagger, takes my fun away. So, brand or bland? You be the judge.

Let’s take a look at Before and After of branding, identity and logo design

Which big brands are ripe for a logo redesign session?

I nominate Blackberry, Pizza Hut, Tim Hortons, Sears, and Lysol. This is based on nothing but a personal opinion, and that’s exactly why many redesigns fail. Instead of dealing with a backlash like Gap and Pepsi, why not break out of a silo and involve designers and customers early in the process? Why not do a logo design contest?

How social is your brand?

I would love to see brands gather opinions and feedback as part of the redesign, rather than dropping their new logos on our heads, hoping we like it. Right, Arby’s? When embarking on a redesign project, please make an effort to get solid feedback from those of us who will see it every day. Doubly so If your brand is looking to establish or reinvent itself as an inherently social brand.

*Image sources: Wikipedia, Logopedia, New York Times, eBay.com, Underconstruction.com, and Twitter

Twitter 2012: Mission Impossible

In this week’s imaginary interview I speak with Twitter about its mission and ambition. For the purposes of my interview, brands look and talk just like people. Now, please all rise and clap with me to welcome Twitter! Clap-clap-clap-clap-clap! As Twitter takes the stage, we have a great theme song playing: “What good is sitting alone in your room? Come hear the music play. Life is a Cabaret, old chum, Come to the Cabaret!”

Me: Twitter, you have been in quite a bit of spotlight lately. New York Times published an essay about your CEO, GigaOM’s Mathew Ingram discussed your co-founder Jack Dorsey’s role in developing your “product”. I would like to ask you a few questions about your mission and your vision, because I am as curious as everyone here about the future of Twitter. Where do you see yourself in five years?

Twitter is channeling Tom Cruise: charming and popular, often deflecting hard questions with a smile and a forced laugh. Great suit, by the way.

Twitter: In my early days, I was about simplicity and minimalism. Remember how we all grew tired of Facebook’s lengthy updates, clunky infrastructure and cluttered user experience? I thought there was value in the status updates and conversations we were able to have on Facebook, but I thought we could do conversations better. Limit users to 140 characters, let them create as many accounts as they like, under any name they like, and interact with each other in real time. Let it be an open platform, with a decent search to discover conversations, and see where people take it. That’s how we saw things at the time. We liked the idea of RSS and thought we could be a social RSS, if that makes sense.

Me: Fast forward to today, Twitter tightened its control over user experience, moved to yet another new spacious office, introduced promoted tweets, twitter cards, limited its search, ended the partnership with Google, pulled out of LinkedIn and Instagram, made changes to the user profile page design for a more visual experience, and I could go on. Most recently, you even said you were considering a video-hosting service. You made a lot of changes that I would say confused your users. Why? We all thought we knew what Twitter was about, but we were wrong. What is your vision, what do you want to be?

Twitter: It’s tough. I improvise as I go. I put out a mission statement: To instantly connect people everywhere to what’s most important to them, in 2011. At the moment though, Twitter is about Twitter. We are still figuring out what we want to be, and we know we want to be making money while we are at it. We feel we need a better control of user experience to sell Twitter to advertisers out there, and do our job better. Right now, we are into envelopes, and we used to be the wire. I’ll explain. You can get everything on Twitter now, without ever leaving our platform. We have gradually realized that Twitter doesn’t have to be the messenger. We can still be the messenger, but more and more, we are your destination. Yes, we are like Facebook. But we are better than Facebook!

Me: Dave Winer and Mathew Ingram think you are a media company. Nick Bilton of New York Times has wondered whether you were a technology company. I think you are an entertainment company. What do you say to that?

Twitter: Whatever. I am in direct competition with media companies. Does that make me a media company? Or does that make New York Times a social media company, a technology company? Whatever. I read in Nick Bilton’s recent profile of Dick Costolo, Twitter’s CEO, for New York Times that Flipboard’s Mr. McCue says Twitter and its C.E.O. are “pushing the traditional limits of what it means to be a company that delivers media to people. It is neither a technology company nor a media company, he says. “Twitter is an entirely new thing.” I do not disagree. Maybe we are just a platform tech company in the media business. We may consider hiring Nick Bilton as our spokesperson. He does a good job. I will say this, though. We are an important company.

Me: Will you “Yes, and” with us, Twitter?

Note: “Yes, and” is an improv formula to keep the improvisation going. And on the next week’s show, I will be talking to Instagram! Keep watching Communicable, and thank you for joining us.

Where will Apple, Amazon, Google meet up next year or the year after? They’re all going to be banks! – Dave Winer

I’m considering changing up my twitter profile to:

Elena Yunusov | as Re-tweeted by Dave Winer | Communicable: social media for nonprofits | HoHoTO co-organizer | Comms at the Ontario Ombudsman’s Office.

Here’s a link to Dave Winer’s prophetic post about Apple, Amazon, and Google becoming banks. I’d add Twitter to his list, since it’s now thinking of entering into eCommerceJuly 2011: Where will Apple, Amazon, Google meet up next year or the year after? They’re all going to be banks! http://0ft.r2.ly/ 

Image

Have a good Facebook morning! Branded existence and the future of advertising.

Eat at McDonald’s? Drink Coca Cola? Get your furniture from IKEA? Would you like a TV station, Radio station, or a catalogue with no women with that?

We are moving into the next chapter of mass communications, in which big brands want to brand as many aspects of your life as possible.

Imagine the life of one Joe Smith. He wakes up with Facebook to see what his friends are up to and reads the news in Facebook’s custom news stream, just like most of us – I even got a study link to prove that this is, indeed, how we wake up these days. Joe then drives to McDonald’s to get some breakfast and watch local news on brand new McDonald’s TV channel, while he eats. Then he drives to work, listening to Coca Cola FM play ads, his favourite songs, customized just for Joe. I could go on.

What if I now told you Joe Smith lived in Saudia Arabia, and after work he will be heading to IKEA to get some new furniture for his home? In his IKEA catalogue, there will be no images of women, because IKEA took an effort to erase women from the catalogue completely. Would that bother you?

When big brands enter a new era of content creation and launch their own TV channels, radio stations, newspapers and magazines, traditional media and especially the notion of independent journalism grasp for air.  In addition to branded TV channels and radio stations we have Scotiabank Nuit Blanche and similar awkward tongue twisters sprouting up. Rogers Centre or The Sony Centre for the Performing Arts, anyone? Why stop there, why not brand our cities, our homes, or our neighbourhoods? But wait, we already do that.

 Have a good Facebook morning

In the end of the day though, us the people – or should I say us the consumers – lead a sort of branded existence.  Have a good Facebook morning, will ya? I love advertising, digital communications, and branding and I sure hope that’s not the future we end up creating for ourselves. On the other hand, lets call it “augmented reality” – somehow it sounds better, doesn’t it?

Branding the future, what a fun concept. How can we use this in our marketing strategy for the next campaign? Can we ask someone to live for our brand, even a little? How about 15 minutes of someone’s life out there, can we brand that? Sure we can, and we will. – Signed, an unknown marketer from ABCXYZ marketing.

We are in the content business baby!

Next time a new and shiny social network or startup comes along, three key questions must be asked before we go all in and invest our resources energy and time. What is your mission? What’s the common perception people have about you? And, finally, what is your ambition? I present you with an imaginary interview where I ask Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google about their mission and their ambitions. Lights on, sound check done, my famous guests nest comfortably in their velvet armchairs under the spotlight, and I channel Oprah, David Letterman, and Barbara Walters combined to get the best out of my interviews. For the purpose of my interview, brands look and talk just like people.

[Music starts playing, social media logos flying around the room like a warm blizzard. This is part 1 of the series of four episodes, and we will focus on Facebook’s mission, ambition and our perceptions.]

Me: Hello Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Google! [Clap, clap, clap, clap]. Thank you for coming to my show; it is always great to see you all in one room. Today’s program is called Mission, Perception and Ambition.

[Audience claps again, and as my guests smile their eyes shine with uncanny confidence, teeth blindingly white under the studio lights. Everyone is wearing a hoody, except for Twitter.]

Facebook: Allow me to begin. After all, I am the biggest social media network in the room, and, arguably the most successful, especially since our launch of the new Facebook app. Facebook’s mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected.

Me: That’s great, Facebook. In preparation for today’s show we took to the streets and asked some of your biggest fans – developers, marketers, and social media types about their perception of Facebook, to see how it aligns with your mission. Here are some of the questions we have heard.

[Video goes on air. Developers, marketers, and social media types from various countries of all shapes, sizes and ages ask the following questions]

Facebook, how does advertising fit with your mission? What are your thoughts on the inherent conflict between your vision of everyone open and connected and privacy of your users? It seems you want to rule the World Wide Web and know way more about us than you should. If your mission were to simply help us connect and be open, wouldn’t it make sense to do so on our terms and build the platform that way? Make the code open, your algorithms transparent? Why do our fan pages never reach more than a certain percentage of the fanbase? Did you know that whenever we discuss Toronto’s mayor Ford, you advertise cars to us? We still like your nonprofit causes, your “Like” button, conversations we have on your platform, some good pictures and updates our friends post, and your new Gifts program that will allow us to send gifts to our friends using your service sounds great. What would you do differently starting today if you knew what you would become? [Video stops].

Me: Facebook, seems to me the public perception of you clashes with both your mission and your ambitions. Your mission makes you sound like a nonprofit organization, does this mean you feel that you have certain social obligations and responsibilities even as you go and make even more money providing us a place to gather, like everyone else in the room here today? What say you, Twitter? Instagram?

[Facebook and Instagram holding hands. Instagram lights up, changes up several filters, going from black and white to colour to sepia. Everybody in the room swoons and aahhs. Meanwhile, Facebook turns to the camera to respond.]

Facebook: I agree that we are a brand with ambition. I will be honest with you. We are going Everywhere. We want to hack the world. We want to hack your world and be the air you breath. We want to be transformational. We are transformational. We will ID everyone on the web, catalogue your thoughts, manage your conversations, track your relationships the way no surveillance agency ever could. We will invade your mind, and you will let us. But we must be careful not to let our power overwhelm us, or else someone might take it away.

[Facebook eyes Google, Twitter, Instagram, then turns to the audience and smiles once more. The room is quiet. The lights slowly go out . My famous guests leave the stage in the dark. Upbeat music starts playing as the next week's show announcement comes on the air "Next week: we talk with Instagram!"]

The next marketing darling – shortlinks as branded content

Shortlinks may just be the next frontier for content marketing when they get the recognition they deserve.

Remember the days of Tinyurl.com? Tinyurl solved the problem we didn’t know we had, especially before Twitter – it transformed long and cumbersome links into short and simple tinyurl links. How did this service market itself? Exactly. We saw this again with bit.ly which added tracking capabilities and analytics to the mix, and became the #1 shortlink service for anyone who knew anything about the web and social media. We all loved .ly, effectively a hack of a top-level Lybia domain that survived even Lybia’s threats to shut down the internet, but who doesn’t love a good hack.

Then bit.ly decided to expand and redesign and as its efforts flopped and pushed bit.ly out of favour with digerati, interesting new developments started happening. 

Links and brands hold hands and walk on a beach into the sunset – branded information

Marketers finally caught up to the fact that links are essentially a branded source of information, not just a vehicle for content. Think about it. When you see nyti.ms – a smart hack of a top-level domain .ms,  which by the way belongs to a Caribbean island Montserrat, you recognize that what you are about to read is New York Times content. Since only New York Times uses this shortlink, it carries a certain promise of credibility and legitimacy. Compare that with a level of unspoken doubt surrounding bit.ly links, forcing users to think each time whether they should click on it or not, and whether someone’s account has been hacked. I’m guessing someone at New York Times read Don’t Make Me Think by Steven Krug.

And the award for the best shortlink goes to.. But first, lets take a look at our nominees.

  • LinkedIn quietly rolled out lnkd.in hacking India’s top-level domain
  • WordPress owns a shortlink wp.me, hack of .me,  Montenegro’s country code
  • Google bought g.co to use the domain as a shortcut for all its products and services for more than $1.5 million (a sweet deal, really), its top level domain courtesy of Republic of Colombia.
  • TechCrunch owns tcrn.ch – did you know .ch stands for Switzerland – Confoederation Helvetica, the Latin name for the country?
  • Twitter finally woke up and offered its t.co service, automatically shortening long links that don’t fit with its 140 character limit, effectively capitalizing on all long links to promote Twitter (Note to marketers, this is what happens when you are asleep at the wheel). If I were a marketer working at Twitter at the time though, I would advise on using something more fun and recognizable, like twt.tr, as a homage to Twitter’s origins. So much better that t.co!
  • Amazon earns an honorable mention for its somewhat scattered efforts of integrating shortlinks, first coming up with amzn.com, quickly followed by its acquisitions of A.Co, Z.Co, K.Co and Cloud.co.

Do shortlinks create more problems than they solve?

Joshua Schachter of Del.icio.us took a stand against shortlinks early on, raising a number of good points (geek out with me here):

“From my past experience with Delicious, I know that a huge proportion of shortened links are just a disguise for spam, so examining the expanded URL is a necessary step. The transit has to hit every shortened link to get at the underlying link and hope that it doesn’t get throttled”.

Despite all the technical challenges, as a marketer I love shortlinks as much as bread loves butter. However, I also hope that the hacking of top-level domains will at least be recognized as such by International domain registries and authorities like ICANN, and that there would be a more thoughtful, long-term solution. Because the rise of shortlinks – and I can only see their number increasing, despite the technical pains – signals a pressing need. For now, technically speaking, shortlinks add another layer of complexity on top of the domain-name train wreck well described by Mathew Ingram (who should consider launching his own shortlink). 

Brands love branded content. Users love knowing where the content is coming from. So who is next? Infomart and Starbucks, I’m looking at you.

I’m holding the shortlinks awards ceremony next year, and I hope you make it.

Negativity and social media: haters will hate

“What if they say something bad about us?” Thing is, bad reviews and negative comments will always be there. Haters will hate. Few businesses escape unscathed without encountering anything negative that was said about them online, or dealing with misinformation. Starbucks has a whole site dedicated to it, where haters (or huge fans, as sometimes the case) gather to express discontent: http://www.ihatestarbucks.com/bb/

However, when a brand takes a proactive approach, monitors these conversations to put out fires early, does ongoing social media monitoring, blogger relations, online community building, due diligence and crisis prevention, keeps its ear to the ground, spends time to lay out the land and establish company’s values and openly engages in dialogue with consumers it is more likely to earn and generate goodwill.

If and when social media crisis hits, active social media presence and a solid crisis management plan will help contain and minimize damage.